Big Brother? (again)

Ask about Home repair, sports, food, entertainment, money, hobbies and crafts, language and literature, social history, geocaching and any other topic related to life and leisure

Big Brother? (again)

Postby Old Dad » Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:48 pm

http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/10/would-you-sign-up-for-a-discount-with-your-power-company-in-exchange-for-surrendering-control-of-your-thermostat-what-if-it.html#posts

Not in my opinion. What I see is a bunch of unreasonably paranoid chicken-littles screaming yet again that the sky is falling. And I say "again" because it's probably the same bunch that became so outraged when they were up in arms about consumer data being collected on individuals at grocery stores and other shopping places. So perhaps they learned which cereal I prefer for breakfast, or maybe how many gallons of milk I buy each month. Or the fact that I don't buy any wine or beer. Big deal - I honestly don't care who knows such things about me. On the other hand, if it helps them keep better track of restocking needs then I think that I - and everyone else - come out winners for it.

Same for my power usage. I figure it stays pretty flat except for when seasons change and I'm not worried about WHO might know that either. As for remotely controlling my thermostat or appliances, they can just forget it. I'm not letting them inside my house. I can take care of all those things just fine on my own. ;) And unlike some other areas of the country (California comes to mind) we don't have blackouts here, rolling or otherwise. Sure, we loose power sometimes during heavy storms, but who doesn't?

What do you think about all the hub-bub, Bud?
Learning comes mostly while young - understanding comes much later in life.
Old Dad
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1199
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Big Brother? (again)

Postby drew » Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:29 am

Old Dad wrote:http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/10/would-you-sign-up-for-a-discount-with-your-power-company-in-exchange-for-surrendering-control-of-your-thermostat-what-if-it.html#posts

Not in my opinion. What I see is a bunch of unreasonably paranoid chicken-littles screaming yet again that the sky is falling. And I say "again" because it's probably the same bunch that became so outraged when they were up in arms about consumer data being collected on individuals at grocery stores and other shopping places. So perhaps they learned which cereal I prefer for breakfast, or maybe how many gallons of milk I buy each month. Or the fact that I don't buy any wine or beer. Big deal - I honestly don't care who knows such things about me. On the other hand, if it helps them keep better track of restocking needs then I think that I - and everyone else - come out winners for it.

Same for my power usage. I figure it stays pretty flat except for when seasons change and I'm not worried about WHO might know that either. As for remotely controlling my thermostat or appliances, they can just forget it. I'm not letting them inside my house. I can take care of all those things just fine on my own. ;) And unlike some other areas of the country (California comes to mind) we don't have blackouts here, rolling or otherwise. Sure, we loose power sometimes during heavy storms, but who doesn't?

What do you think about all the hub-bub, Bud?

I agree completely. These companies aren't attempting to use personally identifiable information when they collect data from their customers...they're only trying to determine trends so they can adapt their services and market their products more effectively. Personally, I think there are some very useful possibilities that come about from this sort of thing.

For instance, my phone has the Google Android OS which uses Google maps. Have you heard of the concept of "crowdsourcing" when it comes to traffic conditions? I can use my phone to check on traffic conditions if I get stuck in traffic. And since my phone has a GPS in it, when I'm using it to view the traffic, the phone also sends my location and driving speed to update the traffic database, refining the information in real-time. You can imagine if there are enough people on the road using such a phone, you can get a very accurate picture of how the traffic is progressing without flying a helicopter or other means. This is potentially the fastest and most accurate way to tell what the traffic picture looks like.

You may have also heard about the robots that mine data on Twitter to detect significant events. It turns out that news travels faster on Twitter than any news agency, so if a computer can "notice" an increase in certain words or phrases being used all of a sudden by thousands of ordinary users, they can alert the public of breaking events faster than any other media.

None of this is "big brother"...it is just private industry using huge amounts of user data in interesting and creative ways. Granted, since the data is there, there's always the possibility of the government to abuse it, but it's certainly not a cause for concern in and of itself...I think it's a great thing.

For what it's worth, my power provider has a "summer discount plan", in which I give them permission to shut off the air conditioning if the energy demand reaches critical levels in exchange for a discount on my bill. As far as I'm aware, they don't track my air conditioning usage, they only have the capability of disabling my air conditioning (of course they already know my energy usage from the meter). They never entered my place...just installed a box on the outdoor air conditioning unit, and they have no visibility regarding what temperature my thermostat is set at (sloppy, 'alarmist' reporting to blame there). I've saved about 20% on my electric bill over the summer and my AC was never interrupted once.
drew
 
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:31 am

Re: Big Brother? (again)

Postby Phonedave » Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:44 am

drew wrote:
Old Dad wrote:http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/10/would-you-sign-up-for-a-discount-with-your-power-company-in-exchange-for-surrendering-control-of-your-thermostat-what-if-it.html#posts

Not in my opinion. What I see is a bunch of unreasonably paranoid chicken-littles screaming yet again that the sky is falling. And I say "again" because it's probably the same bunch that became so outraged when they were up in arms about consumer data being collected on individuals at grocery stores and other shopping places. So perhaps they learned which cereal I prefer for breakfast, or maybe how many gallons of milk I buy each month. Or the fact that I don't buy any wine or beer. Big deal - I honestly don't care who knows such things about me. On the other hand, if it helps them keep better track of restocking needs then I think that I - and everyone else - come out winners for it.

Same for my power usage. I figure it stays pretty flat except for when seasons change and I'm not worried about WHO might know that either. As for remotely controlling my thermostat or appliances, they can just forget it. I'm not letting them inside my house. I can take care of all those things just fine on my own. ;) And unlike some other areas of the country (California comes to mind) we don't have blackouts here, rolling or otherwise. Sure, we loose power sometimes during heavy storms, but who doesn't?

What do you think about all the hub-bub, Bud?

I agree completely. These companies aren't attempting to use personally identifiable information when they collect data from their customers...they're only trying to determine trends so they can adapt their services and market their products more effectively. Personally, I think there are some very useful possibilities that come about from this sort of thing.

For instance, my phone has the Google Android OS which uses Google maps. Have you heard of the concept of "crowdsourcing" when it comes to traffic conditions? I can use my phone to check on traffic conditions if I get stuck in traffic. And since my phone has a GPS in it, when I'm using it to view the traffic, the phone also sends my location and driving speed to update the traffic database, refining the information in real-time. You can imagine if there are enough people on the road using such a phone, you can get a very accurate picture of how the traffic is progressing without flying a helicopter or other means. This is potentially the fastest and most accurate way to tell what the traffic picture looks like.

You may have also heard about the robots that mine data on Twitter to detect significant events. It turns out that news travels faster on Twitter than any news agency, so if a computer can "notice" an increase in certain words or phrases being used all of a sudden by thousands of ordinary users, they can alert the public of breaking events faster than any other media.

None of this is "big brother"...it is just private industry using huge amounts of user data in interesting and creative ways. Granted, since the data is there, there's always the possibility of the government to abuse it, but it's certainly not a cause for concern in and of itself...I think it's a great thing.

For what it's worth, my power provider has a "summer discount plan", in which I give them permission to shut off the air conditioning if the energy demand reaches critical levels in exchange for a discount on my bill. As far as I'm aware, they don't track my air conditioning usage, they only have the capability of disabling my air conditioning (of course they already know my energy usage from the meter). They never entered my place...just installed a box on the outdoor air conditioning unit, and they have no visibility regarding what temperature my thermostat is set at (sloppy, 'alarmist' reporting to blame there). I've saved about 20% on my electric bill over the summer and my AC was never interrupted once.



Call me alarmist if you want, but my concern comes not from what "they" want to do with the information, but on how they protect it.

Take the case of your GPS. Used for tracking traffic, that is fine. However, just what exactly can be gleaned from that dataset.

We can get all of your personal information - the phone is unique to you, and your name, address, payment method, credit history, and call logs are all tied to that phone

We now also know where you are going and how fast you drive when you go there. We can also cross refrence times when your phone is moving at driving speeds and you are using the phone - including if it was a headset, speakerphone, or handheld mode.

We can determine things such as when you parked your car at the airport. Then we make a trip to your house.



Of course T-Mobile is not going to do the above with your data, but others might. And the fact is, data is either leaked, or somtimes given up freely, all to often for me to be comfortable.

The deatailed profile that somone can put together from various data sources is pretty amazing.


Think of it this way. If you were to keep a journal - a very detailed journal, including things like personal identification information, you would not entrust it to a stranger to keep private. But that is the very thing you are doing with the data that companies collect.

-dave
Phonedave
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:58 am

Re: Big Brother? (again)

Postby Old Dad » Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:11 am

Phonedave wrote:
drew wrote:
Old Dad wrote:http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/10/would-you-sign-up-for-a-discount-with-your-power-company-in-exchange-for-surrendering-control-of-your-thermostat-what-if-it.html#posts

Not in my opinion. What I see is a bunch of unreasonably paranoid chicken-littles screaming yet again that the sky is falling. And I say "again" because it's probably the same bunch that became so outraged when they were up in arms about consumer data being collected on individuals at grocery stores and other shopping places. So perhaps they learned which cereal I prefer for breakfast, or maybe how many gallons of milk I buy each month. Or the fact that I don't buy any wine or beer. Big deal - I honestly don't care who knows such things about me. On the other hand, if it helps them keep better track of restocking needs then I think that I - and everyone else - come out winners for it.

Same for my power usage. I figure it stays pretty flat except for when seasons change and I'm not worried about WHO might know that either. As for remotely controlling my thermostat or appliances, they can just forget it. I'm not letting them inside my house. I can take care of all those things just fine on my own. ;) And unlike some other areas of the country (California comes to mind) we don't have blackouts here, rolling or otherwise. Sure, we loose power sometimes during heavy storms, but who doesn't?

What do you think about all the hub-bub, Bud?

I agree completely. These companies aren't attempting to use personally identifiable information when they collect data from their customers...they're only trying to determine trends so they can adapt their services and market their products more effectively. Personally, I think there are some very useful possibilities that come about from this sort of thing.

For instance, my phone has the Google Android OS which uses Google maps. Have you heard of the concept of "crowdsourcing" when it comes to traffic conditions? I can use my phone to check on traffic conditions if I get stuck in traffic. And since my phone has a GPS in it, when I'm using it to view the traffic, the phone also sends my location and driving speed to update the traffic database, refining the information in real-time. You can imagine if there are enough people on the road using such a phone, you can get a very accurate picture of how the traffic is progressing without flying a helicopter or other means. This is potentially the fastest and most accurate way to tell what the traffic picture looks like.

You may have also heard about the robots that mine data on Twitter to detect significant events. It turns out that news travels faster on Twitter than any news agency, so if a computer can "notice" an increase in certain words or phrases being used all of a sudden by thousands of ordinary users, they can alert the public of breaking events faster than any other media.

None of this is "big brother"...it is just private industry using huge amounts of user data in interesting and creative ways. Granted, since the data is there, there's always the possibility of the government to abuse it, but it's certainly not a cause for concern in and of itself...I think it's a great thing.

For what it's worth, my power provider has a "summer discount plan", in which I give them permission to shut off the air conditioning if the energy demand reaches critical levels in exchange for a discount on my bill. As far as I'm aware, they don't track my air conditioning usage, they only have the capability of disabling my air conditioning (of course they already know my energy usage from the meter). They never entered my place...just installed a box on the outdoor air conditioning unit, and they have no visibility regarding what temperature my thermostat is set at (sloppy, 'alarmist' reporting to blame there). I've saved about 20% on my electric bill over the summer and my AC was never interrupted once.



Call me alarmist if you want, but my concern comes not from what "they" want to do with the information, but on how they protect it.

Take the case of your GPS. Used for tracking traffic, that is fine. However, just what exactly can be gleaned from that dataset.

We can get all of your personal information - the phone is unique to you, and your name, address, payment method, credit history, and call logs are all tied to that phone

We now also know where you are going and how fast you drive when you go there. We can also cross refrence times when your phone is moving at driving speeds and you are using the phone - including if it was a headset, speakerphone, or handheld mode.

We can determine things such as when you parked your car at the airport. Then we make a trip to your house.



Of course T-Mobile is not going to do the above with your data, but others might. And the fact is, data is either leaked, or somtimes given up freely, all to often for me to be comfortable.

The deatailed profile that somone can put together from various data sources is pretty amazing.


Think of it this way. If you were to keep a journal - a very detailed journal, including things like personal identification information, you would not entrust it to a stranger to keep private. But that is the very thing you are doing with the data that companies collect.

-dave

Your point is well-taken, PD. Happily, I'm in a particular class of folks that won't be bothered by any of that. No cell phone (and I'm determined to never have one), no debit card and a credit card that only gets used very, *very* rarely.

But I do see how some third-party could mine some interesting data on a large number of people. Of course, anyone who's REALLY very concerned about it could do exactly as I do. ;) Although I'm not untouchable I'm WAY WAY down the list of being a likely target. :)
Learning comes mostly while young - understanding comes much later in life.
Old Dad
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1199
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Big Brother? (again)

Postby Little Beast » Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:40 am

Old Dad wrote:http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/10/would-you-sign-up-for-a-discount-with-your-power-company-in-exchange-for-surrendering-control-of-your-thermostat-what-if-it.html#posts

Not in my opinion. What I see is a bunch of unreasonably paranoid chicken-littles screaming yet again that the sky is falling. And I say "again" because it's probably the same bunch that became so outraged when they were up in arms about consumer data being collected on individuals at grocery stores and other shopping places. So perhaps they learned which cereal I prefer for breakfast, or maybe how many gallons of milk I buy each month. Or the fact that I don't buy any wine or beer. Big deal - I honestly don't care who knows such things about me. On the other hand, if it helps them keep better track of restocking needs then I think that I - and everyone else - come out winners for it.

Same for my power usage. I figure it stays pretty flat except for when seasons change and I'm not worried about WHO might know that either. As for remotely controlling my thermostat or appliances, they can just forget it. I'm not letting them inside my house. I can take care of all those things just fine on my own. ;) And unlike some other areas of the country (California comes to mind) we don't have blackouts here, rolling or otherwise. Sure, we loose power sometimes during heavy storms, but who doesn't?

What do you think about all the hub-bub, Bud?

Indeed, a smart power meter can become very useful in the future.
I have a big "However..." though.
From my part my power meter can collect all data it needs to power all my electrical devices as efficient as possible, but I really don't see why it needs to send that data to my power company.

"To level the output of our power plants as much as possible" is a moot point. They can do that already for decades by monitoring the power distribution boxes (or whatever you call those things) you can find in every neighborhood. And they can predict this very, very accurate with lots of variables, like historical data, weather predictions, traffic jams, what time the superball broadcast ends, etc...

The only data I would like to send to my power company is my the value of my counter once or twice a year. Not because I'm paranoid (although I'm very careful with my personal data), but simply, because that's all they need to know.
--------------------
Create fear, offer a solution and you rule the world !
User avatar
Little Beast
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Big Brother? (again)

Postby Elefino » Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:46 pm

Old Dad wrote:http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/10/would-you-sign-up-for-a-discount-with-your-power-company-in-exchange-for-surrendering-control-of-your-thermostat-what-if-it.html#posts

Not in my opinion. What I see is a bunch of unreasonably paranoid chicken-littles screaming yet again that the sky is falling. And I say "again" because it's probably the same bunch that became so outraged when they were up in arms about consumer data being collected on individuals at grocery stores and other shopping places. So perhaps they learned which cereal I prefer for breakfast, or maybe how many gallons of milk I buy each month. Or the fact that I don't buy any wine or beer. Big deal - I honestly don't care who knows such things about me. On the other hand, if it helps them keep better track of restocking needs then I think that I - and everyone else - come out winners for it.

Same for my power usage. I figure it stays pretty flat except for when seasons change and I'm not worried about WHO might know that either. As for remotely controlling my thermostat or appliances, they can just forget it. I'm not letting them inside my house. I can take care of all those things just fine on my own. ;) And unlike some other areas of the country (California comes to mind) we don't have blackouts here, rolling or otherwise. Sure, we loose power sometimes during heavy storms, but who doesn't?

What do you think about all the hub-bub, Bud?

It's probably one of those "slippery slope" issues. Y'know, "If we let 'them' get away with this, where will it end?"
User avatar
Elefino
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 10:50 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA

Re: Big Brother? (again)

Postby Old Dad » Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm

Elefino wrote:
Old Dad wrote:http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/10/would-you-sign-up-for-a-discount-with-your-power-company-in-exchange-for-surrendering-control-of-your-thermostat-what-if-it.html#posts

Not in my opinion. What I see is a bunch of unreasonably paranoid chicken-littles screaming yet again that the sky is falling. And I say "again" because it's probably the same bunch that became so outraged when they were up in arms about consumer data being collected on individuals at grocery stores and other shopping places. So perhaps they learned which cereal I prefer for breakfast, or maybe how many gallons of milk I buy each month. Or the fact that I don't buy any wine or beer. Big deal - I honestly don't care who knows such things about me. On the other hand, if it helps them keep better track of restocking needs then I think that I - and everyone else - come out winners for it.

Same for my power usage. I figure it stays pretty flat except for when seasons change and I'm not worried about WHO might know that either. As for remotely controlling my thermostat or appliances, they can just forget it. I'm not letting them inside my house. I can take care of all those things just fine on my own. ;) And unlike some other areas of the country (California comes to mind) we don't have blackouts here, rolling or otherwise. Sure, we loose power sometimes during heavy storms, but who doesn't?

What do you think about all the hub-bub, Bud?

It's probably one of those "slippery slope" issues. Y'know, "If we let 'them' get away with this, where will it end?"

Ah-ha! Good job, Joel, I think you've nailed it down!! There does seem to be a very large segment of the population that's worried by "creeping erosion" of personal privacy. We've seen what amounts to a backlash in the form of a POW attitude - "name, rank and serial number is all you get from me!"
Learning comes mostly while young - understanding comes much later in life.
Old Dad
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1199
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Big Brother? (again)

Postby drew » Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:36 pm

Phonedave wrote:Call me alarmist if you want, but my concern comes not from what "they" want to do with the information, but on how they protect it.

Take the case of your GPS. Used for tracking traffic, that is fine. However, just what exactly can be gleaned from that dataset.

We can get all of your personal information - the phone is unique to you, and your name, address, payment method, credit history, and call logs are all tied to that phone

We now also know where you are going and how fast you drive when you go there. We can also cross refrence times when your phone is moving at driving speeds and you are using the phone - including if it was a headset, speakerphone, or handheld mode.

How does T-Mobile know what IO device is plugged into it? This isn't information that needs to be communicated over the network.

Besides, the GPS is only enabled when I choose to use Google Maps, so there's only a very incomplete picture of my driving patterns.

We can determine things such as when you parked your car at the airport. Then we make a trip to your house.

Also, I don't imagine of this information is aggregated in one place. T-Mobile is interested about my calling patterns, but not my GPS data. Google receives the traffic data, but I don't imagine they have my billing information and so forth (although that is moot because they do have access to a good portion of my browsing activity).

In any case, I see your point. I'm just not worried myself...it would take a lot of effort to be able to cross-reference all of these different information sources if someone were to maliciously use this data.
drew
 
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:31 am

Re: Big Brother? (again)

Postby Phonedave » Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:53 pm

drew wrote:
Phonedave wrote:Call me alarmist if you want, but my concern comes not from what "they" want to do with the information, but on how they protect it.

Take the case of your GPS. Used for tracking traffic, that is fine. However, just what exactly can be gleaned from that dataset.

We can get all of your personal information - the phone is unique to you, and your name, address, payment method, credit history, and call logs are all tied to that phone

We now also know where you are going and how fast you drive when you go there. We can also cross refrence times when your phone is moving at driving speeds and you are using the phone - including if it was a headset, speakerphone, or handheld mode.

How does T-Mobile know what IO device is plugged into it? This isn't information that needs to be communicated over the network.

Besides, the GPS is only enabled when I choose to use Google Maps, so there's only a very incomplete picture of my driving patterns.

We can determine things such as when you parked your car at the airport. Then we make a trip to your house.

Also, I don't imagine of this information is aggregated in one place. T-Mobile is interested about my calling patterns, but not my GPS data. Google receives the traffic data, but I don't imagine they have my billing information and so forth (although that is moot because they do have access to a good portion of my browsing activity).

In any case, I see your point. I'm just not worried myself...it would take a lot of effort to be able to cross-reference all of these different information sources if someone were to maliciously use this data.


Your phone knows what I/O device is plugged into it. For example, thats how a flip phone knows not to disconnect the call when you close it if it has a headseat attached (or teathered via Bluetooth). Now, if that information is transmitted along with the call set-up/controll traffic/tear-down, thats a different question. It COULD be, but for now I doubt that it is.

OK, so you only turn on the GPS when you use Google Maps - why? Are you trying to mask your position (or perhaps battery life) Do you actualy turn off the location transmission in your phone, or do you just turn off the maps. Unless you actualy instruct the phone not to (usualy via a deep settings menu) all phone broadcast their location whenever in contact with a cell tower (which is every few seconds). There is a setting where you can turn that 'feature' off unless you dial 911

It is really not that much effort to cross refrence the data. I have done it to a few people - just to show them what can be done by someone like me, a rank amature with no special access to anything. Of course most of those people are the ones who are happy when a google search for their name turns up 100 hits.

I really don't worry about it either. I am far from paranoid about it. I am trying to draw a paralell and the best I can come up with is lung cancer. I am not worried about developing lung cancer either. I do not smoke, and if possible I stay away from second hand smoke, but if I am in a situation where I am around people smoking, I do not run from the room. I know the risks, I take reasonable actions to mitigate those risks, but I do not obsess over the risks or deveoping the disease. I also know that some people make take all the risks and never develop the problem, and others may avoid all risks and still develop it.

I guess its the same with identy theft/information security. I take reasonable steps to mitigate the risk, but it is not something I dwell on, but I am aware the risk is out there.

-dave
Phonedave
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:58 am

Re: Big Brother? (again)

Postby drew » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:41 pm

Phonedave wrote:OK, so you only turn on the GPS when you use Google Maps - why? Are you trying to mask your position (or perhaps battery life) Do you actualy turn off the location transmission in your phone, or do you just turn off the maps. Unless you actualy instruct the phone not to (usualy via a deep settings menu) all phone broadcast their location whenever in contact with a cell tower (which is every few seconds). There is a setting where you can turn that 'feature' off unless you dial 911

The GPS receiver consumes battery life pretty quickly, and on the Android phone there's an icon at the top that shows the GPS status (flashing when it's trying to get a fix, and solid when it has one). Sure, the network-based location service is always working, but not the GPS receiver.

I have a few apps that use the GPS. Google Maps, obviously. Google "My Tracks", which is a GPS logger I use when I go hiking. And Google's "Places Directory", which helps me find things like local restaurants and movie theaters. There's also a simple App I wrote myself when I was learning how to write applications. It shows the current GPS data such as lat, long, and velocity in text format. The GPS receiver never turns on unless I run one of these applications.
drew
 
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:31 am


Return to Life and Living

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron